AP used as propaganda outlet by Taliban

Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil.

Thomas Mann

This cite above should be remembered by everyone living in peaceful Western countries who have forgotten already that freedom is not for free. I am sick of stories like this one:

An Associated Press (AP) photographer, Rahmatullah Naikzad, was a witness to a Taliban murder. [...] The AP was clearly used as a propaganda outlet for the Taliban Does this make him an accomplice or only a witness to the crime? When you know a crime is about to be committed, do you not have a moral and ethical obligation to try to prevent that crime? Even if you're a journalist? Even if all you do is try to call the authorities, in this case someone in the Afghani government or NATO?

Dr. Rusty Shackleford (14/07/2008)

Please read the article through first. It explains why this AP employee may be a accomplice rather than a witness.

The AP is another one of those main-stream media (MSM) that try to maintain neutrality in the presentation of the information, but that end up being manipulated by the totalitarians and showing a biased version of the facts.

Fortunately, the internet is still free and everyone (not only the evil-minded people) can make use of this network. There is a miriad of websites that have sprung to fight the battle of the ideas in this new edition of the clash of the Western and Islamic civilisations: the anti-Jihad websites.

Love and freedom.